site stats

Tirath singh v. bachittar singh

WebSep 28, 2004 · Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh And Others 2 Court: Supreme Court Of India Date: Sep 15, 1955 Cited By: 204 Coram: 3 ...proviso contemplates notice only to persons who are not parties to the petition. 6. WebThe view taken by the Gujarat High Court in (1981) 132 ITR 159 (Guj) (supra) has been upheld by the Supreme Court in case of CIT v. Madhukant M. Mehta (2001) 247 ITR 805 (SC). 10. In CIT v. J.H. Gotla (supra), the fact of the case are that assessee has transferred some part of the machinery of his business to wife and minor children. Wife has ...

Golden rule of interpretation and mischief rule of …

WebTirath Singh v/s Bachittar Singh and Others Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1955 Decided On, 15 September 1955. At, Supreme ... before they are named.Reliance was also placed by the … WebTirath Singh Vs. Bachittar Singh & Ors [1955] INSC 38 (15 September 1955) 1955 Latest Caselaw 38 SC Citation : 1955 Latest Caselaw 38 SC Judgement Date : 15 Sep 1955 … cinthol ph https://changesretreat.com

The Golden rule of Interpretation - Academike

WebBachittar Singh. Fort of Kotla Nihang Khan, village Kotla Nihang Khan, Rupnagar district,Punjab,India. Bhai Bachittar Singh (6 May 1664 – 22 December 1705), often known with the honorific "Shaheed" (martyr), was a Sikh hero and a general of Guru Gobind Singh. [1] His father was Bhai Mani Singh and he came from Alipur Riyasat Multan. WebAug 7, 2024 · There was a dispute regarding the issuance of the notice under section 99 of the Representation of People’s Act, 1951, with reference to corrupt activities involved in the election in the case of Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh. According to the rule, the notice must be sent simultaneously to everyone who has signed the election petition as a ... WebFeb 26, 2024 · Bachittar Singh. Shamrao V. Parulekar v. District Magistrate, Thana The Supreme Court reiterated Maxwell’s premise: “Even if the same words used in the same section, and even the same sentence, must be taken differently, the reading that would undermine the Act’s aims must be rejected.” cinthol parent company

Bachittar Singh - Wikipedia

Category:Rajasthan Rajya Sahakari ... vs Itat & Anr. on 19 September, 2002

Tags:Tirath singh v. bachittar singh

Tirath singh v. bachittar singh

Tirath Singh vs Bachittar Singh And Others on 15 September, 1955

WebAn account cited that after Singh fought on the bank of a stream called Sarsa, where all of his companions perished, he was wounded during an encounter with the Mughal army on … Webpublic health and not – broadcasting (G. Chawla v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1959 SC 544). Answer 1(c) According to Section 2(1) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, …

Tirath singh v. bachittar singh

Did you know?

WebFeb 26, 2024 · 18 Rananjaya Singh v Baijnath Singh AIR 1954 Sc 749. 10 P a g e. ... In India, the Supreme Court in Tirath Singh V. Bachittar Singh 28 approved and adopted the purposive . approach. WebDec 17, 2014 · In Tirath Singh v. Bachitter Singh the appellant argued that it was obligatory under Section 99 (1) (a) of the Representation of the Peoples Act, 1951 for the tribunal to record names of all persons who had been guilty of corrupt practices including parties and non-parties to the petition and that under the proviso, notice should be given to ...

WebJul 27, 2006 · Appeal under Article 133 (1) (c) of the Constitution of India against the Judgment and Order dated the 12th January 1954 of the Pepsu High Court in Civil Misc. … WebTirath Singh vs Bachittar Singh And Others on 15 September, 1955 Showing the contexts in which section 100 appears in the document Change context size Current 465 viso.

Web(October 25, 1948), provides for an appeal to a Division Bench against a judgment, decree or order of one Judge of the High Court, on a certificate granted by the Judge or in his absence by the Chief Justice, except where the judgment, decree or order is made in exercise of criminal appellate jurisdiction or in exercise of the powers of … WebFeb 15, 2024 · Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, AIR 1955 SC 850 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be …

WebSharma Management Inc. Jan 2013 - Present10 years 4 months. Milpitas, California.

WebJul 12, 2006 · Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh And Others. 20. Court: Supreme Court Of India. Date: Sep 15, 1955. Cited By: 204. Coram: 3 ...circumstances, the complaint that the evidence and the ... cinthol mrpWebOct 17, 2024 · Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh RESEARCH PAPERS Shrikant P Thombre, General principles of statutory interpretation with special reference to golden rule & … cinthol productsWeb(Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, A.I.R. 1955 S.C. 830 Rule of Harmonious Construction. It is the responsibility of the Courts to avoid “a head-on clash” between two sections of the … diall brown wood fillerWeb“17. It is true there is a principle of interpretation of statutes that the plain or grammatical construction which leads to injustice or absurdity is to be avoided (see Venkatarama Iyer, J. in Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh 1955 2 SCR 457 (AIR at p. 855). But that principle can be applied only if ‘the language admits of an interpretation ... cinthol logoWebMar 30, 2024 · Bachittar Singh (1955). In this case, the Court held that the provisions of impugned Section 99 of Representation of People’s Act, 1951, must be interpreted by … cinthol manufacturerWeb[476 D-E] Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, [1955] 2 S.C.R. 457, referred to. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 97 of 1964. Appeal by special leave from … cinthol redWebIt is to be noted that in a case which went up before the Supreme Court and which is Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, the certificate under article 133(1)(c) of the Constitution was granted by the High Court in respect of its judgment in relation to a proceeding which came up before the High Court from an Election Tribunal in exercise of its ... dialled a number